Issue: Qualification: Discrimination (Sex), Method/Means (Other), , Ruling date: March 2, 2001, Ruling #2001EE, Agency: Department of Military Affairs Outcome: Not Qualified.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Department
of Employment Dispute Resolution
QUALIFICATION RULING OF DIRECTOR
In the matter
of Department of Military Affairs
March 2, 2001
The grievant has requested a ruling on whether her November 1, 2000 grievance with the Department of Military Affairs qualifies for a hearing.1 The grievant claims that management discriminated against her based upon her sex. Specifically, she alleges that management discriminated against her by not promoting her to the position of Lead Painter. For the reasons discussed below, this grievance does not qualify for a hearing.
FACTS
The grievant is employed as a Painter with the Department of Military Affairs. On October 23, 2000, the Lead Painter departed on short-term disability under the Virginia Sickness and Disability Program (VSDP). The grievant met with her supervisor on that date to determine if she would be promoted to Lead Painter. She was informed that no immediate selection action could be initiated because the position was not vacant. Additionally, she was told that the position would not be filled if it became vacant due to budgetary constraints. The grievant claims that she was not promoted because of her gender.
DISCUSSION
By statute and under the grievance procedure, management reserves the exclusive right to manage the affairs and operations of state government.2 Thus, claims relating to issues such as the methods, means and personnel by which work activities are to be carried out generally do not qualify for hearing, unless the grievant presents evidence raising a sufficient question as to whether discrimination, retaliation, or discipline may have improperly influenced management's decision, or whether state policy may have been misapplied.3 In this case, the grievant alleges that she was discriminated against based upon her gender.
To qualify a sex discrimination grievance for hearing, there must be more than a mere allegation of discrimination - there must be facts that raise a sufficient question as to whether the actions described within the grievance were the result of prohibited discrimination based on the grievant's protected status, in other words, that because of her gender she was treated differently than other "similarly-situated" employees. Where the agency provides a legitimate, nondiscriminatory business reason for the disparity in treatment, the grievance should not be qualified for hearing, absent sufficient evidence that the agency's professed business reason was a pretext or excuse for discrimination.4
As a female, the grievant is a member of a protected class. Thus, she must present facts that establish that the alleged discriminatory actions were because of her gender. In support of her claim, the grievant states that she has been with the agency eighteen years, and the previous three times a lead position has been open, males were promoted. However, management has provided a legitimate nondiscriminatory business reason for not promoting the grievant at this time; agencies may only recruit to fill positions that are vacant.5 In this instance, the Lead Painter position is not vacant -- the employee holding that position is on short-term disability under the VSDP.6 Therefore, management had no authority to initiate action to fill the position or to make any oral commitment to the grievant. Additionally, management has informed the grievant that, should the position become vacant, management will not fill the position because of budgetary constraints. This determination is within management's discretion based upon management's authority to determine the means, methods and personnel by which work activities are undertaken.
The grievant has presented no evidence to suggest that the agency's stated reasons for not promoting her to the position of Lead Painter are a mere pretext for discrimination. Nor has this Department's investigation revealed any such evidence. Accordingly, this issue does not qualify for hearing.
APPEAL RIGHTS AND OTHER INFORMATION
For information regarding
the actions you may take as a result of this ruling, please refer to the enclosed
sheet. If you wish to appeal this determination to the circuit court, please
notify your Human Resources Office, in writing, within five workdays of receipt
of this ruling. If the court should qualify your grievance, within five workdays
of receipt of the court's decision, the agency will request the appointment
of a hearing officer unless you should notify them that you do not want to proceed.
Neil A.G. McPhie,
Esquire
Director
June M. Foy
Employment Relations Consultant